So the table is set up and troops deployed so I shall hand over to the generals to describe events and only break the narrative to explain how the rules have operated. There will be some stretching of the narrative to make it seem more like an actual battle account but no fiddling with the operation of the rules. So instead of saying the rules limit visibility to x yards the narrative might say 'a slight mist hung over the field at this early hour limiting my view to no more than x yards'. For me if the game allows a believable narrative to develop then the rules are working as intended.
From A True Relation of Timerton Fight containing all which it is needful to know of the designs of Prinz Ruprecht towards the Godly folk of Birmingham
"The army being drawn together close upon Northampton it was resolved that it should March to the East to find the forces of the German Prince Ruprecht. Certain intelligences were provided that he intended to move against Birmingham and we were instructed to interfere with these designs. Accordingly we went via Daventry intending to March through Rugby towards Coventry. No sooner had the army left the vicinity of Daventry but we received word that a large force was some distance to the East. We bent our course accordingly and two days after, the army's forage parties clashed with bodies of horse close upon the village of Timerton. Scouts being sent forth it was ascertained that the enemy was less than days march from us and marching hither with alacrity.
A council being called it was resolved to meet the enemy on the morrow. Accordingly an order of march and scheme of deployment was drawn up such that every officer should know his place. Some time after sunset scouts came into with some intelligence of the numbers of the enemy, they having espied them upon the road. Their count was that the enemy seemed close to our numbers but had no artillery. Five great bodies of foot and numerous bodies of horse were seen to be present."
Neither side's horse have the required numbers to 'out scout' the other so numbers of troops are reported with only a 10% variation. It is always possible to reduce or increase the reported number of bodies by one hence the no artillery present report. After scouting results are disclosed both sides draft a general deployment plan before terrain is generated. Tactical orders are written once terrain is laid out and the initial deployments made. There is scope to adjust the deployment as sketched but this is limited. In a two player game the Commanders are deployed first then the front lines of each army and then any troops visible to the enemy commanders. Then tactical orders are drawn up. If being used, standing orders covering things such as the range at which a unit will start shooting, or foot will form pike stands against cavalry can be drawn up in advance or the generic ones from the rules used (based on experience and training).
From the letters of Sir Robert Snell (Commander of the Royalists)
"The Prince had granted some discretion as to our actions subject only to the proviso that we should seek out any opportunity to bring the Rebels to the field of battle such that by so doing they should have no liberty to interfere with his plans. In accordance with these commands I ordered the army to advance towards Daventry so as to appear to threaten Northampton and cut the great North Road. Shortly after we commenced this motion I had word that a very large force of the rebels was ahead of me, which very much suited my purpose. My officers being well appraised of my intentions there was naught to do except bring the enemy to battle, which we set out to do with great good will. By some mischance we knew not how close they were until some skirmishes were reported close to our front and all we could ascertain was that the enemy was present in numbers akin to our own. I therefore gave my orders for the next day as it seemed that we should fight in the morning, whether we willed it or not.
The ground was not such as I should have wished for, indeed it was greatly to our disadvantage. Should the enemy not have been upon us I should have withdrawn a piece to seek better ground. I considered what might be done and determined that we should close upon them as quickly as possible to reduce the advantage they held in artillery and also to occupy the enclosures around Timerton village."
The table is divided into 1 foot squares of and terrain is laid out using cards drawn from a standard pack of playing cards, one per square. Any picture card, ace or joker creates a terrain item in the square, all others cards create clear squares. Terrain items include the start of a river or stream which, if drawn, will run to a random table edge. I have decided that the rules need a mechanism to allow players to move terrain to avoid battlefields like this one! Once scouting reports are exchanged and terrain set out the players write orders. These consist of an action, a target (location or enemy unit) and a speed of action. There can also be a delay built in before acting upon the order. Changes of orders during the game require a reaction test to be passed and the new order to be transmitted down the chain of command.
The Battlefield is split by a river which divides the Royalist deployment area into two roughly equal halves. Because of the deployment decided on before the terrain was laid out the Royalists will not be able to easily co-ordinate their actions. The Parliamentarians are not having things all their own way either as a stream is restricting the movement of their right wing. Also if they advance too far then their left will be separated from the rest of the army by the river. Lastly there is a low ridge directly to their front which masks one of their guns but would make a decent defensible feature. Time to amend the deployment and write orders. Back to the True relation.
"On seeing the lay of the land over which the battle were to be fought it was clear that the intended deployment would ill serve the Parliament men. My Lord x determined to make a shift in the placing of the guns on the right to allow them to better play upon the enemy's ranks. Other than this and the small adjustment to the right most Infantry battalia to allow this all else seemed to serve as well as may be...."
Using the change to deployment rules one field piece and an infantry battalia are exchanged no other changes are made by either side. I'm wondering if there should be a turn one AP penalty for to any units whose location is amended under these rules.
"...These changes being taken in hand orders were confirmed. The left hand cavalry wing being over matched should make best speed to deny the enemy use of the bridge over the River Timer and to hold the ground betwixt the eminence on the right and the river. It was desired that they should not do ought else but hold that place. The centre was to advance with the greatest of haste and bring the enemy foot to hand strokes with only the minimum of musketry first. The Horse on the Right were to advance apace to be forward of the foot and to drive the opposing horse from the field. It was allowed that to achieve this they should extend their lines further unto that flank."
Parliament's adjusted deployment |
The Royalist deployment. The wing furthest from the camera is stacked up deep! |
In the photo's above the coloured markers behind each unit show the the current CE status which is based on the outcome (before situational adjustments) and assuming an average dice roll of 7 on 2D6 when taking the test. They are colour coded for a general description but don't show the exact value.
At the end of the Royalist first turn, their troops are struggling to deploy for combat
|
Turn 2 ends with Parliament in control of the high ground |
And the cavalry on Parliament's left about to clash |
The first two turns consisted of both sides frantically rearranging their cavalry wings which takes time as the manoeuvre rules are designed to make this difficult. Parliament have their left wing in orderly formations as are the opposing horse. Both sides infantry is struggling to deploy and the bridge is not closed to the Royalists but is going to be heavily contested. The first clashes are about to occur and that will tell a tale (or perhaps not)!
Fantastic! Sounds like the rules are based on a good top down assessment of 17th C warfare. The table looks like a proper battle map. And the style of the AAR is spot on.
ReplyDeleteBravo matey, I suspect that this write up took a bit of work - but it was well worth it. The terrain and the miniatures look brilliant (the way you’ve accurately depicted and deployed the foot in particular). The explanation of the rules as you went along was in sufficient detail to justify what was happening on the table - without being burdensome.
ReplyDeleteAs a by the by, and not that my opinion counts for anything, I think the AP penalty for changing a units deployment is a good idea and should be incorporated.
I hope your other blog followers enjoyed this as much as I did. Top stuff.
We need more please.
Well I did steal the idea of interspersing explanations in a different colour from you!
Delete